Low-Pressure PU Foaming Machine — CE / ISO 9001-certified pu foaming machines by UREXCEED. Lead time 30 – 45 days, MOQ 1 set.

Low-Pressure PU Foaming Machine

Low-Pressure PU Foaming Machine

Smaller, more flexible machine for wine cabinets, mini-bars, vaccine boxes and R&D pilots. Quick recipe switches when you run dozens of small cabinet variants. 5–250 g/s output.

Czas realizacji
30 – 45 days
Min. zamówienie
1 set

Engineering reply within 24 hours

Quote + spec sheet + tailored sizing recommendation. WhatsApp answered 9 am–6 pm Beijing time.

Specyfikacja techniczna

Output Range
5 – 100 g/s (small parts) up to 250 g/s (display cabinets)
Output Pressure
10 – 30 bar
Mixing Type
Dynamic mechanical mixing (motor-driven impeller)
Day Tank Capacity
40L / 80L / 160L / 250L per component
Tank Temperature
PID ±1°C, electric jacket heating
Recipe Switching
Manual purge → switch (5–10 min), or dual mixing head for instant swap
Mixing Head Self-Clean
Solvent flush cycle, 30–60s
Cycle Time per Shot
8 – 60s configurable
Power
220V / 380V · 50/60Hz, 3 – 8 kW
Footprint
~6 m² (typical 80L configuration)
Suitable For Daily Output
50 – 800 cabinets per day (small refrigerator categories)

Zastosowania

  • Wine cellar cabinet (28 / 46 / 100 / 180 bottle)
  • Mini-bar refrigerator (compact hotel / dorm)
  • Cosmetics & skincare refrigerator
  • Breast milk / vaccine cold storage box
  • Beverage display cooler (small)
  • Built-in cabinet panel & shelf foaming
  • R&D pilot runs & sample cabinet production
  • Small chest freezer (≤ 150L)

When a low-pressure machine actually beats a high-pressure one

Most refrigerator factories should buy the high-pressure machine. But there are three situations where the low-pressure version is genuinely the right call.

Low-pressure vs high-pressure PU machine comparison — when to use each for refrigerator production

Small cabinets

Small cabinets (under ~30L of foam per shot). The high-pressure machine's minimum reliable shot is ~50g; below that the mixing head doesn't reach steady state. Wine cabinets, mini-bars, vaccine boxes typically need 5–25g shots. Low-pressure handles them naturally.

Many small-batch variants

Many small-batch variants. If you build 8–20 cabinet SKUs in batches of 50–200 each (typical for wine cabinet OEMs, hotel mini-bar suppliers, medical cold storage), recipe-switching time dominates. The dual-head low-pressure config swaps recipes instantly. The HP machine purges for 10+ minutes between recipes — that's 30% of your shift on recipe changes alone.

R&D and pilot runs

R&D, pilot runs, sample production. New cabinet designs need 1–2 weeks of trial foaming to dial in. The HP machine's big day tanks mean every recipe iteration wastes 10–20kg of material. The LP machine's 40–80L tanks make each iteration cost a fraction of that.

Capex constraints

Capex is 1/3 of the HP machine. If you're a startup or testing market demand for small refrigerators, the LP machine lets you start production with a fraction of the upfront cost.

What's inside the low-pressure machine

Mechanically simpler than the HP machine, which is the point. Fewer moving parts, easier to maintain, easier to train operators on.

Dynamic mixer

Dynamic mechanical mixing — a motor-driven impeller in the mixing head. The polyol and ISO enter the mixing chamber separately and the impeller mixes them at 2,000–3,000 RPM. Less homogeneous than HP impingement, but adequate for cabinets where k-factor isn't the headline spec.

Smaller tanks

Smaller jacketed day tanks (40 / 80 / 160 / 250L per component). Electric jacket heating, PID ±1°C. No N₂ blanket needed (the lower throughput and smaller tanks mean atmospheric moisture isn't a problem).

Dispensing gun

Hand-held or fixed-position dispensing gun. Cycle time per shot is 8–60 seconds (programmable). Most factories run hand-held for flexibility.

Simpler PLC

Simpler PLC (Siemens S7-200 SMART or Mitsubishi FX5) — recipe storage, output adjustment, basic temperature logging. No remote diagnostics on the base spec (available as upgrade).

Optional dual head

Optional dual-head configuration. Two mixing heads on the same machine, one for each recipe. Instant recipe swap without purging — for factories running many cabinet variants.

Eight small-refrigerator scenarios we ship this machine for

The low-pressure machine isn't a "general purpose" machine — it's specifically for these refrigerator categories where HP overkill and HP recipe changeover cost dominates.

Wine cabinets (28 / 46 / 100 / 180 bottle). Multiple SKUs per OEM, small batches, foam volume 3–8 kg per cabinet.

Hotel / dorm mini-bar refrigerators (20–50L). High variety (different countries, different OEM branding), small batches.

Cosmetics / skincare refrigerators (10–25L). Boutique product, dozens of designs, very small batches.

Breast milk / vaccine cold storage boxes. Often regulated, often custom-spec for the buying agency. Small volumes, high variant count.

Small beverage display coolers (table-top, 20–60L). Used in cafes, convenience stores, hotel rooms.

Built-in cabinet panel & shelf foaming for cabinets where the main shell is foamed elsewhere but smaller parts need separate foaming.

R&D pilot runs and sample cabinet production. Cheap to iterate, cheap to scrap a bad design and start over.

Small chest freezers (≤150L) — domestic / small commercial. Often regional brand variants.

Foam quality: low-pressure honest comparison

Worth being honest about the trade-off. Low-pressure foam is not as good as high-pressure foam. For cabinets where energy class is decisive, this matters. For most small refrigerators, it doesn't.

Metric Low-pressure High-pressure
k-factor (W/m·K) 0.022 – 0.025 0.018 – 0.020
Closed cell content 88 – 92% 95%+
Density consistency ±8% ±3%
Cell size uniformity 150 – 250 µm 100 – 180 µm
Practical EU energy class A+ to A (cabinet dependent) A++ to A+++

Translation: for wine cabinets, mini-bars, vaccine boxes — where the buyer cares about size, looks, price, and reliability more than about energy class — the LP foam quality is fine. For mainstream household refrigerators going to EU consumers, run the HP machine.

Using this machine for R&D and pilot production

About a third of our LP machine customers buy it specifically as the R&D / pilot line. Here's how that typically works.

  1. 1

    Week 1 — Concept and CAD: cabinet outer dimensions, inner volume, target market, target energy class, blowing agent choice (usually HFC or HFO at this scale, not cyclopentane).

  2. 2

    Week 2 — Mould design and manufacture (we can do this in parallel — see our mould product family).

  3. 3

    Week 3–4 — First trial foaming. Tune shot weight, cream time, gel time, mould temperature. Expect 5–10 iterations before the foam looks right.

  4. 4

    Week 5 — Energy class testing (third-party lab). Measure k-factor and calculate cabinet energy consumption.

  5. 5

    Week 6–8 — If energy class is short, re-formulate polyol blend. If cabinet geometry is the problem, modify the mould. Iterate.

  6. 6

    Week 9–12 — Production sample run (50–200 cabinets) for buyer approval / certification.

  7. 7

    Production-ready handover. Either keep using the LP machine for ongoing low-volume production, or step up to an HP machine if forecast volume justifies it.

What pairs with the low-pressure machine

Like with the HP machine, we engineer the chemistry around this specific equipment. Saves you the integration headache.

LP-grade polyol. We supply LP-grade polyol systems (typically water-blown or HFC-blown — cyclopentane is overkill at this scale). Smaller drum sizes (200L drums or 1,000L IBCs) match LP machine consumption rates.

Small refrigerator moulds. Small refrigerator moulds — typically aluminum, single cavity, simpler than the big steel cabinet moulds. We make these in parallel for first-time customers.

Browse our refrigerator-grade PU raw material system →

Service & Support

Warranty & Service

On-site intervention available in every region where we have delivered projects.

On-Site Installation

Our engineers fly to your factory to supervise installation, layout verification, and first-run production.

Commissioning + Tuning

Trial run + parameter tuning to your local raw material, climate, and target product spec — until throughput meets contract.

Operator Training

5-10 day on-site training for production team, QC, and maintenance — bilingual manuals + video tutorials provided.

3-Year Warranty + Spares

Core equipment 3-year warranty, electrical 2-year. Spare parts in stock with global express shipment 24h dispatch.

Często zadawane pytania

When does a low-pressure machine actually beat a high-pressure one?
Three situations: (1) cabinets are small (under ~30L of foam per shot), so a high-pressure machine wastes material on every recipe switch; (2) you build dozens of model variants in small batches (wine cabinets, mini-bars), so quick recipe changeover matters more than throughput; (3) you're running R&D / pilot production where flexibility beats speed. Capex is also about 1/3 of a high-pressure machine.
Can I get the same k-factor (0.018) on a low-pressure machine?
Realistically no. Low-pressure dynamic mixing is less homogeneous than high-pressure impingement, so closed cell content typically caps at 90–92% (vs 95%+ on HP). You'll see k=0.022–0.025 instead of 0.018–0.020. For wine cabinets, mini-bars, vaccine boxes and similar small cabinets where energy class is not the primary spec, that's fine. For mainstream EU A++ household refrigerators, run the HP machine.
How fast can I switch between recipes?
On a single-head machine, recipe switching means a solvent purge cycle of 5–10 minutes between batches. If you're running 20+ recipe changes a day (a typical wine cabinet OEM building 8 SKUs), spec the dual-head configuration — two mixing heads in parallel, instant swap, no purge.
What's the smallest cabinet you can foam?
About 5L of foam per shot is the practical lower bound — below that, the shot is too short for the dynamic mixer to reach steady state. We've foamed mini-bars as small as 20L cabinet volume (≈3 kg foam each) on this machine routinely.
Can the low-pressure machine handle cyclopentane?
Technically yes, but we don't recommend it. Cyclopentane needs the closed-circuit blanket and ATEX safety package that's standard on the HP machine — fitting all that to an LP machine roughly doubles its cost. For LP scale, stick with HFC-245fa or HFO-1233zd(E) blowing agents. We supply matching polyol systems for both.
How long does R&D / sample production typically take on this machine?
For a new cabinet design, plan on 1–2 weeks of trial foaming to dial in shot weight, cream time and mould temperature. The machine's small day tanks make it cheap to scrap a bad batch and start over. Most R&D departments running this machine get from concept to production-ready cabinet in 4–6 weeks.
What's the daily output and how does that compare to HP?
A typical 80L LP machine handles 50–300 cabinets a day depending on cabinet size. An HP machine handles 2,000–8,000. If you cross 800 cabinets/day on small refrigerators, it's usually cheaper to step up to a small HP machine. We can walk you through the breakeven math.
What support do you provide after the sale?
Same as the HP machine: on-site commissioning (5–7 days for LP), spare parts stocked in Shanghai / Istanbul / Dammam, remote diagnostics free for 2 years, and a 2-year warranty on the pump and mixing assembly. Plus the LP machine is simpler — most operators are running production confidently within a week.

Potrzebujesz kompleksowego rozwiązania chłodniczego?

UREXCEED integruje formy, maszyny do pianki, linie produkcyjne i materiały z 6 fabryk partnerskich. Podaj cel kapacytetowy, w 24h przedstawimy konfigurację i wycenę.